Cases 11 - 20 of 7,861
Hawkins v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Eugene, John I-V Does and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Bree et al
as 4:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Bree and Abe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donovan v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03512
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Donovan
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Major FNU Gregg, A W Fredricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brown, Curtis v. Kraus et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Curtis V. Brown
Defendant:
CO Kraus, Warden Buesgen and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Santiagos et al
as 4:2024cv03519
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Santiagos, Tom, Monique and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arlean et al
as 4:2024cv03522
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Arlean and Dr. Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yabut v. McLaughlin et al
as 2:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Robbyjoe V Yabut
Defendant:
McLaughlin MD Gary S. and All Red RN Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigue v. Fugate et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tigue
Defendant:
Lisa L. Fugate, Karen Blondell, Don Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Defendant:
Senior Warden Phonso J. Rayford, Correctional Officer Vanessa Valero, Correctional Officer Ruth Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
