Cases 21 - 30 of 89,954
Stitely v. John's Hopkins Otolaryngology et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
John's Hopkins Otolaryngology and Alenezi Abdulrahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Florek et al
as 4:2024cv11653
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves
Defendant:
Stepheny Florek, Robinson, Kelly and others
Brown v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 4:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Raymond Darnell Brown
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Spokane County, Dr Elliot Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Carrington et al
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Dominique Darnell Robinson
Defendant:
CO Carrington, John Doe, CO Rupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatlyn, Peter v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv22444
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Gatlyn
Defendant:
John Doe, Senior Chaplin Stasney, J. Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Willie L Richardson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Randy Smith, . Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03169
Plaintiff:
Maza Lynch
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, . Owens, . Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03172
Plaintiff:
Michael L Williams
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Cederholm et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Carter
Defendant:
. Cederholm, . Silva, . Righteous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Charles Summers and Charles Benard Summers
Defendant:
John Galipeau, John Galipean, Jason English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
