Cases 21 - 30 of 1,164
Bernard v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50134
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Amanda Irick, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soliven #342149 v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Garett Rosendo Soliven
Defendant:
Renae Hoffman, Nathan Graham, Patrick Karaloff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman et al v. Pirc et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hoffman, Joseph F. Laffey, Blake Huffman and others
Defendant:
Ken Pirc, Tracy Dietsch, Anne Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chalifoux v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chalifoux
Defendant:
Carlos Eduardo Mendoza and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dwayne Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DAVIS, aka Dwayne Davis-El
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, in their personal capacity, LES PARISH, Warden, in their personal capacity, THOMAS P. MACKIE, Former Warden, in their personal capacity and others
Rafael Bean v. Nathan Hoffman
as 24-1220
Petitioner:
RAFAEL VERNIER BEAN
Respondent:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden
Hoffmann, Alan v. Boughton, Gary
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Alan Hoffman and Alan Hoffmann
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
