Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,191,076
Newman v. Correction
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff: Reginald Newman
Defendant: Dept of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2024cv00852
Plaintiff: Idrick Thomas
Defendant: Caddo Correctional Center, Deputy Jones, Sgt Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fallon v. Riverbend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00843
Plaintiff: Stephon Enrique Fallon
Defendant: Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOOD v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2024cv00224
Petitioner: ANDREW P FLOOD
Respondent: WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL
Not Yet Classified: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Al Shimary
as 2:2024cv11646
Defendant: Naif Al Shimary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mercer #769438 v. Hudtari et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Mathew Mercer #769438
Defendant: Uknown Hudtari and Unknown Lakaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: Christopher Grady
Defendant: State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Attorney General State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. USA
as 3:2024cv00372
Petitioner: Cordaryl Ford
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lomax v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff: Justin Lomax
Defendant: John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mounce v. Hickman et al
as 4:2024cv00885
Plaintiff: Rickie L. Mounce
Defendant: Jason Hickman and Charles Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?