Cases 41 - 50 of 35,514
Randy Capehart v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 24-11795
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE CAPEHART
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES, WHEELER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Lee v. Stanton et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Gilford Lee
Defendant:
D. Stanton, Warden Larry T. Edmonds and Reg. Administrator Adrian Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thayer v. USA
as 2:2024cv01010
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Thayer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Gadsen County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv22047
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones
Defendant:
Gadsen County Sheriffs Department and State of Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Christopher Lee Card
as 3:2024cv03211
Amicus Curiae:
Christopher Lee Card
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reich v. Silver Bow Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Reich
Defendant:
Silver Bow Detention Center, Mike Regan, Mark Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beecher v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Beecher
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00513
Petitioner:
Darren Lee Joy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz Deleon (PS) v. Linnemeyer et al
as 1:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Diaz Deleon
Defendant:
August Linnemeyer, Tiffany Mizelle, Jessica Linnemeyer-Schlagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
