Cases 41 - 50 of 2,509
Jerry Alfred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13263
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED
Respondent / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bronson v. US
as 23-1796
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH NEIL BRONSON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Char v. Tresch et al
as 1:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Defendant:
Maura Tresch, Richard Banner, Deane Hatakeyama and others
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shores (PS) v. Colorado Department of Correction et al
as 1:2023cv02540
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Shores
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Correction, Dean Williams, Core Civics America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neil Rudolph
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazzo v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. McDowell
as 4:2023cv04405
Petitioner:
Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Restricted Filer - Alfred v. Dixon
as 1:2023cv23187
Plaintiff:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED and Jerry Neil Restricted Filer - Alfred
Defendant:
Antony Blinken and Secretary Ricky D Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tatum v. Rose et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dustin Seth Tatum
Defendant:
Sharon Rose, Cynthia Casagrande, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
