Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Alaska matching "S"
Cases 161 - 170 of 829,791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Yabut v. S. et al
as 2:2024cv01088
Plaintiff: Robbyjoe V Yabut
Defendant: McLaughlin MD Gary S. and All Red RN Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. The City of New York
as 24-1551
Plaintiff: CEDRIC REID
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, MARTHA W. KING, In their official and individual capacity, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., In their official and individual capacity and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Artrip
as 24-6559
Plaintiff: KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant: WARDEN ARTRIP, INVESTIGATOR HARRIS, ASSISTANT WARDEN BLEVINS and others
USA v. Bradley Goddard
as 24-1991
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRADLEY S. GODDARD
Weston v. DocuSign, Inc., et al.
as 24-3610
Respondent: RICHARD R. WESTON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner: DOCUSIGN, INC., DANIEL D. SPRINGER, MICHAEL J. SHERIDAN and others
National Association of Manufacturers, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1191
Petitioner: National Association of Manufacturers and American Chemistry Council
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as EPA Administrator
Shiva Ayyadurai v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5153
Plaintiff: Shiva Ayyadurai, Dr.
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States and Gary Thompson, District of Columbia, Board of Elections
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff: MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant: MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
Cruz v. Barry, et al
as 3:2024cv00667
Plaintiff: Jose B. Cruz
Defendant: Rebecca Barry and Richard Bango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?