Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Five Rivers Carpenters, et al v. Covenant Construction Services, et al
as 23-3183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, and Royce Peterson and Mike Novy as trustees and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund, and David Unzeitig and Robert Doubek as trustees
Defendant / Appellant:
Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Nathan Caetano v. Kings County Sheriff, et al
as 22-16067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN CAETANO
Defendant / Appellee:
KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF, NOCONA SOBOLESKI, Kings County Superior Court Executive Officer/Clerk of the Court and KEITH HOLLAND, Eastern District of Caliifornia Executive Officer/Clerk of the Court
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Covenant Construction Services LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund
Respondent:
Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Covenant Construction Services LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, Royce Peterson, Mike Novy and others
Defendant:
Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement (Definitions)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. District Group Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
A&A Contractors, LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and District Group Inc. doing business as District Contracting Group
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF Z-MODULAR, LLC v. MCN BUILD, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02947
Defendant:
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC., ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and MCN BUILD, INC.
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF Z-MODULAR, LLC and Z-MODULAR, LLC
Counter Defendant:
WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund; Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund et al v. Western Surety Company
as 3:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund; Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund , District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund , District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Western Surety Company and Glen/Mar Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Intl Assn of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers et al v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv01918
Plaintiff:
International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers , Regional District Council Welfare Plan and Trust , Regional District Council Retirement Plan and Trust and others
Defendant:
Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C., QPL, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Trustees of the Iron Workers District Council of New England Pension, Health Welfare, Annuity, Vacation and Education Funds et al v. S&R Corporation/PiHL, Inc. Joint Venture et al
as 1:2012cv10183
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Iron Workers District Council of New England Pension, Health Welfare, Annuity, Vacation and Education Funds and Iron Workers Local No. 37 Retirement Plan
Defendant:
S&R Corporation/PiHL, Inc. Joint Venture, Western Surety Company and The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
