Cases 1 - 10 of 351
Pinnacle Bank v. Veterinary Management Incorporated, et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Bank
Defendant:
Veterinary Management Incorporated, Main Street Veterinary Holdings, LLC, David S Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. DRAAM, Corp et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
DRAAM, Corp, 4MACS, LLC, David MacMelville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
CUSHING v. GREENTREE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LP et al
as 1:2024cv05742
Plaintiff:
DAVID CUSHING
Defendant:
GREENTREE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LP, FREEDOM MORTGAGE, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE CORP. doing business as MR. COOPER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Borges et al v. Stryk Group USA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
David L. Borges and Jennifer Borges
Defendant:
Stryk Group USA, LLC and Jeffrey Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. v. David Martin
as 24-1579
Plaintiff:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID MARTIN
TRUIST BANK v. ELGEO CORP et al
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
Elgeo Corp, David Alhalabi and Irakli Sharashenidze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. v. David Martin
as 24-1296
Plaintiff:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID MARTIN
Johnson v. Frankenberg
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
David Frankenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
CAROL CRAFT v. DAVID DEMPSEY
as 2:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
CAROL CRAFT
Defendant:
DAVID DEMPSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
