Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SQUARE RING INC v. TOOLE et al
as 3:2024cv00491
Defendant:
Island Fights Championships, Inc., ASM Global LLC, DEAN ONEILL TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
SQUARE RING INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VOLTZ v. ASM AMERICA INC.
as 2:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
JOHN VOLTZ
Defendant:
ASM AMERICA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ASM America Incorporated v. Kim
as 2:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
ASM America Incorporated
Defendant:
Bok-Heon Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
M & M Interior Solutions, Inc. v. ASM Modular Systems, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04442
Plaintiff:
M & M Interior Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
ASM Modular Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oshinowo v. ASM Holdings LLC
as 2:2020cv11393
Defendant:
ASM Holdings LLC, Davena Knight, Rebecca Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Olusegun Oshinowo, Golden Castle LLC, Somewhere Out There LLC and others
Networking & Engineering Technologies, Inc. v. ASM Research, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
Networking & Engineering Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
ASM Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atrium Companies, Inc. et al v. ASM Technologies Limited
as 4:2012cv03243
Plaintiff:
Atrium Companies, Inc. and Champion Window, Inc.
Defendant:
ASM Technologies Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Drake v. Withrow et al
as 3:2011cv02439
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Wendel Withrow, ASM Upholstery, Yu-Lan Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drake v. Withrow et al
as 4:2011cv00649
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Wendel Withrow, ASM Upholstery, Yu-Lan Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Miller et al
as 3:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rogers and Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Andy Miller, Thomas Billups, ASM Sports and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
