Cases 21 - 30 of 42
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.87 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-23-22 et al
as 3:2018cv01765
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.87 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-23-22, THE SILKOTCH LIVING TRUST, FRANCES M. SILKOTCH (TRUSTEE), JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 84.53 acres of land, more or less, in Calhoun, Marshall, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Defendant:
Stephen M. Fye and Nancy F. Fye, Daisy Beardshaw, Janice F. Brookover and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 466.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Mason, Putnam, Roane and Wirt Counties, West Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
466.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Mason, Putnam, Roane and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Mary Lou Harshbarger , Sharon Juanita Davis and others
Consol_defendant:
93.48 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Putnam and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Marilyn D. Ramey , Town of Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000 et al
as 2:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000, Mark C Kanzigg, Tracy J Kanzigg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Bonin et al v. Sabine River Authority of Texas
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Perry Bonin , Ace Chandler , Michael . Manuel and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority of Texas and Sabine River Authority of Louisiana
Respondent:
Judy Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 1.93 Acres and Temporary Easements for 1.96 Acres in Richmondville, Schoharie County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 91.-3-5 et al
as 1:2014cv02014
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 1.93 Acres and Temporary Easements for 1.96 Acres in Richmondville, Schoharie County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 91.-3-5, A Permanent Easement for 1.69 Acres, Permanent Access Easement for 0.42 Acres and Temporary Easements for 2.40 Acres in Richmondville, Schoharie County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 91.-3-4, Frances D. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
USA v. Land St Martin Parish et al
as 6:2014cv03137
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Land St Martin Parish, J Paulin Duhe L L C, Gretchen Blumenthal Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.108 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2012cv07505
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.108 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, PAUL E. MORRONGIELLO and FRANCES IRENE MORRONGIELLO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way Over a Total of 5.3 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Tipton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02842
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way Over a Total of 5.3 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Tipton County, Tennessee, William A. Bringle, Frances G. Bringle and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
Windham vs City of Center, Texas etal
as 9:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steve Windham
Defendant:
John Windham, Chuck Lunsford, Jim Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
