Cases 21 - 30 of 53
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. Easement and Right-of-Way Across A strip or tract of land fifty (50) feet in width, more or less, located in and being a portion of the E1/2SE1/4 & E1/2W1/2SE1/4 of Section 6, Township 141N, Range 48W, 5th Principal Merid
as 0:2018cv00905
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
Easement and Right-of-Way Across A strip or tract of land fifty (50) feet in width, more or less, located in and being a portion of the E1/2SE1/4 & E1/2W1/2SE1/4 of Section 6, Township 141 N, Range 48, Fred & Ray LLP, Fred Schlanser, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 169.19 acres of land, more or less, in Doddridge, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties, West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Defendant:
Jack J. Cunningham, Jerry Dane Jobes, Henry E. Kelley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant:
1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C. v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, WV et al
as 2:2017cv04214
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C.
Defendant:
An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, D. Lane McMillion, Dale L. McMillion and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000 et al
as 2:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000, Mark C Kanzigg, Tracy J Kanzigg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.46 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Overton County, Tennessee, Donna Reid Ray, Kevin Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 4.19 Acres of Land in Hamilton County Florida et al
as 3:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
4.19 Acres of Land in Hamilton County Florida, Unknown Heirs and Beneficiaries of Robert Wright, Unknown Heirs and Beneficiaries of Cora B. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 4.172 Acres of Land in Lake County Florida et al
as 5:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
4.172 Acres of Land in Lake County Florida, William Ray Glidewell , Wells Fargo Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
USA v. Land St Martin Parish
as 6:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
M P S Two L L C, Elizabeth Ann Snyder Hamilton, Sarah Jane Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 foot wide permanent easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2015cv00275
Defendant:
100 foot wide permanent easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines, Brian Clinton Walker, Michael F Murdock and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oklahoma City and Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
