Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff: Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.13 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 303677000 (27*3A), IDENTIFIED AS THE FIRST TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED...et al
as 2:2018cv00058
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.13 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 303677000 (27*3A), IDENTIFIED AS THE FIRST TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED...et al, Ahmad Khalil Shy, Jr., Andre Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C. v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, WV et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04214
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C.
Defendant: An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, D. Lane McMillion, Dale L. McMillion and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Dominion Transmission, Inc. v. Armstrong Telephone, Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv06693
Plaintiff: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: Armstrong Telephone, Co., Kelly J. Keesey, Terry A. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Dominion Transmission, Inc. v. Armstrong Telephone, Co., et al
as 1:2016cv00836
Plaintiff: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: Armstrong Telephone, Co., Kelly J. Keesey, Terry A. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
EQUITRANS, L.P. v. AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY ET AL
as 2:2016cv00934
Plaintiff: EQUITRANS, L.P.
Defendant: AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY, DAVID R. FINK, JR., LAUREN E. FINK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
EQUITRANS, L.P. v. AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPLELINE ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG AND INDIANA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00570
Plaintiff: EQUITRANS, L.P.
Defendant: AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPLELINE ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG AND INDIANA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA, ERNEST ANDERSON, EDWARD DUNMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00119
Plaintiff: SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant: REAL ESTATE, ESTATE OF RICHARD ALSTON AND BOBBIE ALSTON, RICHARD LEE ALSTON, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00097
Plaintiff: SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant: REAL ESTATE and SANDRA G YARBROUGH JONES
Consol_defendant: REAL ESTATE, CARLTON FARMS INC, TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC and others
Consol_counter_defendant: RAYFIELD SPENCER and REAL ESTATE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America v. Land, et al
as 2:2015cv06244
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Land and Alice Cazezu Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?