Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States of America v. Myrex, et al
as 5:2022cv00885
Defendant: Ricky Van Myrex, Thomas Wayne Myrex, Kevin Lee Myrex and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 831 dd - Land Condemnation
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant: Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff: United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff: Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00029
Defendant: Elnora L Deer, Sally Arlene Mann, Barbara Judkins and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant: Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.70 Acres, more or less, in the city of Suffolk, Virginia PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG ONLY!
as 2:2018cv00388
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 1.70 Acres, more or less, in the city of Suffolk, Virginia, located on parcel identification no. 49*29, identified as 62.1 acres, et al and Jimmy Parker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.13 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 303677000 (27*3A), IDENTIFIED AS THE FIRST TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED...et al
as 2:2018cv00058
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.13 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 303677000 (27*3A), IDENTIFIED AS THE FIRST TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED...et al, Ahmad Khalil Shy, Jr., Andre Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 171.54 Acres of land, more or less, in Fairfield, Hocking, Monroe, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, and Vinton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00070
Defendant: 171.54 Acres of land, more or less, in Fairfield, Hocking, Monroe, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, and Vinton, Heirs of Marcella D. Allen, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Interested Party: Craig Paynter, Keith W Schneider and Shawn Judge
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a
United States of America v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect To Land In Gordon County, Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00341
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tree-Removal Rights With Respect To Land In Gordon County, Georgia, Danny N. Parker and Rebecca C. Parker
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 1.33 Acres and Temporary Easements for 1.48 Acres in Sidney, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 140.-1-47.1 et al
as 3:2014cv02092
Plaintiff: Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant: A Permanent Easement for 1.33 Acres and Temporary Easements for 1.48 Acres in Sidney, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 140.-1-47.1, Parker Hollow Preservation Club 1, LLC and And All Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?