Cases 51 - 60 of 102
SCIORE et al v. PHUNG et al
as 1:2018cv13220
Plaintiff:
OLD CITY PRETZEL COMPANY, LLC and MICHAEL SCIORE
Defendant:
STUDIO KP LLC, JOHN DOES #1-8 and KELLY PHUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOX v. JAGGER REALTY et al
as 5:2018cv00255
Defendant:
BLAIR MYERS, BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS REAL ESTATE SUCCESS and JAGGER REALTY
Plaintiff:
KELLIE BOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goode v. Manchester et al
as 5:2018cv00116
Defendant:
Travis F. Alcombrack, Judge James P. McClusky, Kristyna S. Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren S. Goode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Trump et al
as 2:2018cv10133
Defendant:
Stephen A. Smith, Ryan Friedlinghaus, Mario Lemieux and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Adams
Rice v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv02684
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Rice
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Taggered Boyd, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. WHNS Fox Carolina et al
as 6:2017cv03261
Plaintiff:
Cale Marcus Strickland
Defendant:
WHNS Fox Carolina, Kelly Bean and Les Dann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SmileDirectClub, LLC v. Orthodontic Associates et al
as 1:2017cv03431
Plaintiff:
SmileDirectClub, LLC
Defendant:
Orthodontic Associates , Jeffrey C. Miller, D.D.S., P.A. , Jeffrey C. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Khan v. County Of Dupage et al
as 1:2017cv03540
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Waqas Khan
Defendant:
County Of Dupage, DuPage County Sheriff's Office, Dupage County State's Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Sennholz et al
as 2:2017cv10578
Plaintiff:
Jerroll Sanders
Defendant:
Kelly Sennholz , Kirstin Elaine Martin , Diane Blumstein and others
Berlin v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2015cv06046
Plaintiff:
Monica Berlin
Defendant:
LinkedIn, ProTech Security, Tracy Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
