Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tigress McDaniel v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Black Political Caucus
as 23-1051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG BLACK POLITICAL CAUCUS OF CHARLOTTE, MEKO CHOSEN and DOES
Lomax v. Mayor of the City of Miami
as 23-1982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, CITY OF MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, JORGE LOO and others
MONGE v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv02942
Plaintiff:
JANET MONGE
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMY GUTMANN, WENDELL PRITCHETT, KATHLEEN MORRISON, DEBORAH THOMAS, and CHRISTOPHER WOODS, PAUL MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Minnix et al v. Sinclair Television Group, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Crystal Dawn Muse Minnix, Carlton Roy Minnix, Jr., Eugene Allen Muse, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sinclair Television Group, Inc., Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., ACC Licensee, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Portnoy v. Insider, Inc., et al
as 22-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PORTNOY
Defendant / Appellee:
INSIDER, INC., HENRY BLODGET, NICHOLAS CARLSON and others
Portnoy v. Insider, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10197
Plaintiff:
David Portnoy
Defendant:
Insider, Inc., Henry Blodget, Nicholas Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Tigress McDaniel v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Black Political Caucus
as 22-1687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG BLACK POLITICAL CAUCUS OF CHARLOTTE, MEKO CHOSEN and DOES
McDaniel v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Black Political Caucus of Charlotte et al
as 3:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tigress McDaniel
Defendant:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Black Political Caucus of Charlotte, Meko Chosen and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
