Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ammons v. McCall
as 7:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Charles Lester Ammons and Juvenile Z.A.
Defendant:
Jodie McCall, Brunswick County DSS, Brunswick County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green v. Kansas City Juvenile Court
as 2:2019cv02359
Plaintiff:
Monica A. Green
Defendant:
Kansas City Juvenile Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Safronova et al v. Juvenile Court Essex County et al
as 1:2015cv10433
Plaintiff:
Svetlana Safronova, Valentina Safronova and Jeffrey Powers
Defendant:
Juvenile Court Essex County, Lynn Police Dept, Lynn DCF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 1:2013cv01477
Plaintiff:
Nathan Taylor
Defendant:
Department of Juvenile Justice and Department of Juvenile Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Georkeshia Denise Campbell v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2012cv07091
Defendant:
Alcoholic Anonymous Central Offices, Antelope Valley Courthouse, Michael D. Antonovich and others
Plaintiff:
Georkeshia Denise Campbell
Kyra Wood v. Michell Maciorowski, et al
as 09-4420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYRA R. WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELL MACIOROWSKI and COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, JUVENILE DIVISION
Wood v. Maciorowski et al
as 3:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kyra R Wood
Defendant:
Michell Maciorowski and Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, Juvenile Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Central Park Products, Inc. v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
as 5:2007cv05012
Plaintiff:
Central Park Products, Inc. and Central Park Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
