Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Conrad James, Jr. v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 23-13039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONRAD JOSEPH JAMES, JR. and CONRAD JAMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae:
INGRID EAGLY, DAVID G. GUTIERREZ, MAE NGAI and others
J. L. v. Laura Weber, et al
as 18-55317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. L.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA WEBER, in her individual capacity, TAMMY ESSLINGER, in her individual capacity, ALVO GONZO, in his individual capacity and others
JL v. Weber et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
JL
Defendant:
Laura Weber, Tammy Esslinger, Alvo Gonzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Royalty Network, Inc., et al v. Carl Harris, et al
as 13-12460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE ROYALTY NETWORK, INC., FRANK LIWALL and STEVEN WEBER
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL HARRIS, d.b.a. Phat Groov Music, PHAT GROOV MUSIC, PHAT GROOV MUSIC LLC and others
Lamb v. Weber et al
as 1:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lamb
Defendant:
Fintegra LLC and Doreen Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Carothers v. Weber
as 4:2013cv04026
Plaintiff:
Derrick Carothers
Defendant:
Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
The Royalty Network, Inc. et al v. Harris et al
as 1:2012cv03133
Plaintiff:
The Royalty Network, Inc. , Frank Liwall and Steven Weber
Defendant:
Carl Harris, Phat Groov Music, Phat Groov Music LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royalty Network Incorporated et al v. Harris
as 2:2012cv00361
Defendant:
Carl Harris
Plaintiff:
Royalty Network Incorporated , Frank Liwall and Steven Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinsella, M.D. v. Weber
as 1:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Kinsella, M.D.
Defendant:
Amelia L. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Weber et al
as 3:2008cv01937
Plaintiff:
Laurence N. Fisher
Defendant:
Sheryll A. Weber, Dennis C. Kovitch and Diane C. Fisher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
