Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Coleman v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Coleman
Defendant:
Charles Ray Miles, C.J. Transportation, Inc., Cidney M. Ordoyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Barrantes v. Beaver County Auto Rental, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02930
Plaintiff:
Gregory Barrantes
Defendant:
Beaver County Auto Rental, Inc., Latsko Automotive, LP and Matthew Thomas Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Maduena
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas Sargent and JB Hunt Transport Inc.
Maduena v. Sargent et al
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Maduena
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas Sargent and JB Hunt Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lewis v. Coal City COB Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
XL Insurance America, Inc., Coal City COB Company, Inc. and Jonathan Caleb Depo
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solis v. Rickman
as 2:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas Rickman
Plaintiff:
Morgan, Individually and as Next Friend of B.S., a Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Singh et al
as 3:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas
Defendant:
Michael Jaymes Blough, Surender S. Bhatti and Sudhar Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Protective Insurance Co
as 6:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haider v. Donald et al
as 8:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
Nadeem Haider
Defendant:
Aaron Matthew Thomas Donald and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles Francis Johnson and Robin Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas King and Mark Jamalian King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
