Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Daniels et al v. The Boeing Company
as 3:2013cv05679
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , John and Jane Doe and John Doe Two Company
Plaintiff:
Clifford C Daniels and Eileen N Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Reed v. The Boeing Company
as 6:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Reed
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sustaire v. Boeing Company, The, et al
as 6:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sustaire
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The , Boeing Defense, Space and Security and Nicholas Buelow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCALENEY v. THE BOEING COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv01441
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCALENEY
Defendant:
THE BOEING COMPANY, UNITED AIRLINES, INC. , XYZ COMPANIES #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Debra Dawson et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 2:2012cv10686
Defendant:
Boeing Company, Conexant Systems Inc, Meritor Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dawson and Debra Dawson
Myers v. Obama, et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Myers
Defendant:
Barack H Obama and Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. The Boeing Company
as 2:2011cv02932
Plaintiff:
John Woods
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dixon v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00361
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation and The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Ceasar Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen v. Boeing Company
as 2:2009cv01247
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hansen
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
CAREY v. DYLAN AVIATION, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv02893
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL E. CAREY, RUSSELL E. CAREY and RUSSELL E. CAREY
Defendant:
DYLAN AVIATION, LLC, ROLLS-ROYCE OF AMERICA, INC., ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
