Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Arceneaux et al v. Louisiana Regional Landfill Company et al
as 2:2023cv07349
Plaintiff:
Joyce Arceneaux, Sharon Halsell, Tracy Thomas and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Regional Landfill Company, Inc., Waste Connections Bayou Inc, Waste Connections US Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. MORAN FOODS LLC, et al
as 5:2018cv00408
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION, MORAN FOODS LLC and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Randall's Food & Drug LP et al
as 3:2018cv02852
Defendant:
Randall's Food & Drug LP and Randall's Beverage Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Pearson et al
as 6:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Christopher D-Wayne Young
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, John Sandersfield and Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Lenning v. Brantley County, Georgia, et al
as 14-11014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LENNING
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANTLEY COUNTY, GEORGIA, ROBERT THOMAS, Sheriff, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA and others
Jones v. Hadley
as 1:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Kyle Hadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Wanchese Fish Company, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Wanchese Fish Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Lenning v. Brantley County, Georgia et al
as 2:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenning
Defendant:
Brantley County, Georgia, Robert Thomas, Glynn County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Wanchese Fish Company, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01395
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Wanchese Fish Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Jones v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02579
Plaintiff:
Willis Kevin Jones
Defendant:
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
