Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Fenton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01664
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Fenton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Huffman v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00627
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Huffman
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
O'SHEA v. ANDERSEN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv07971
Defendant:
JOHN DOE WHOLESALE CO., JOHN DOE DRIVER #1, JOHN DOE DRIVER #4 and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL O'SHEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asciutto et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
Ralph L Barocas, Kathleen Giannone, Raymond Joseph Gormley and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Kramer v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11394
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Kramer
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Kevin Michael Brophy Jr v. Belcalis Almanzar et al
as 8:2017cv01885
Defendant:
DOES 1-20, inclusive, Belcalis Almanzar, Washpoppin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Brophy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keaton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv01027
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Keaton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keaton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv09572
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Keaton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2016cv01507
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MARK SALAZAR and KEVIN MICHAEL SALAZAR
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al
as 12-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Third Party - Appellee:
YVONNE S. OSTERWALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
