Cases 1 - 10 of 72
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis et al v. Ennen Eye Center et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Plaintiff:
Jerry K Davis and Susan L. Davis
Defendant:
Ennen Eye Center, Dr. Parker Pratt and Dr. Randy Ennen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Wu et al
as 1:2024cv11273
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Michelle Wu, Brittany Vo, London Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Collins et al
as 1:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Nick Collins, Nick Collins' Son, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Walsh et al
as 1:2024cv11275
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Martin Joseph Walsh, Joan Marie Duffy, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2024cv10359
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
John McCarthy, Kaplana George, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rosen v. Montefiore et al
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Randy Rosen
Defendant:
Montefiore, Montefiore Home, Montefiore Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Townley v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Randy Townley
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
