Antitrust Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
J M SMITH CORPORATION v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04370
Defendant: HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PLIVA, INC., AKORN, INC. and others
Plaintiff: J M SMITH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
J M Smith Corporation v. Watson Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07110
Defendant: Hetero USA Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation and J M Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
J M Smith Corporation v. Forest Laboratories Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05735
Defendant: Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Allergan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company and J M Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
J M Smith Corporation v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv04581
Defendant: Allergan Sales, LLC, Forest Laboratories Holdings, Ltd., AbbVie Inc. and others
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company and J M Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03565
Plaintiff: BELLCO DRUG CO., FWK HOLDINGS, LLC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP. and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS HOLDCO, U.S. INC, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
J M Smith Corporation v. Shire LLC et al
as 1:2017cv10229
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation
Defendant: Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant: Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff: RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee: J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
J & M Distributing, Inc. v. Hearth & Home Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv00072
Plaintiff: J & M Distributing, Inc.
Defendant: Hearth & Home Technologies Inc. and Magnotti and Sons, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?