Antitrust Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 97
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SUPERVALU, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2007
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE, ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HEB GROCERY CO. LP, RITE AID HEADQUARTERS CORPORATION, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2006
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., VALUE DRUG COMPANY, KROGER COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1521
Defendant / Appellant: RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party: JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00956
Petitioner: Besins Healthcare, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant: Actavis, Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc and others
Respondent: Burlington Drug co., Miami-Luken, Inc., Value Drug Company and others
Counter Defendant: Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court: National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re: Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff: Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05708
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Walgreen CO and The Kroger Co.
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo International PLC, PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2012md02409
Plaintiff: International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 595 Health And Welfare Fund, All Plaintiffs, New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Assoc. of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund and others
Interested Party: CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Value Drug Company, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC., CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Intervenor: Express Scripts, Inc., Christopher Wirth, Edward Breivik and others
Defendant: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA USA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation
Petitioner: Mr. TIMOTHY C. HESTER
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AHOLD USA, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02641
Defendant: HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC. and others
Plaintiff: AHOLD USA, INC., ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., CESAR CASTILLO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
American Sales Company, LLC v. Pfizer, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00361
Defendant: Pfizer Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., G.D. Searle LLC and Pfizer, Inc.
Interested Party: Greenstone LLC and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. and Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?