Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Walgreen Co. et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv10049
Plaintiff:
H-E-B, L.P., The Kroger Co., Walgreen Co. and others
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA L.P., ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., HANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Walgreen CO et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv09861
Plaintiff:
Walgreen CO, The Kroger Co., H-E-B LLP and others
Defendant:
Endo International PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
THE KROGER CO. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, LLC, H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY L.P. and THE KROGER CO.
Defendant:
PLIVA, INC., HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., SANDOZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FWK Holdings, LLC v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv05426
Defendant:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc., LUPIN LTD and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC
Petitioner:
City of Providence, H-E-B LP, Albertsons Companies Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Walgreen Co. et al v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv07843
Defendant:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co., H-E-B LP, Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05708
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Walgreen CO and The Kroger Co.
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo International PLC, PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2012md02409
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 595 Health And Welfare Fund, All Plaintiffs, New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Assoc. of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund and others
Interested Party:
CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Value Drug Company, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC., CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Intervenor:
Express Scripts, Inc., Christopher Wirth, Edward Breivik and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA USA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation
Petitioner:
Mr. TIMOTHY C. HESTER
In Re:
Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Kroger Co. et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04534
Defendant:
Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc., Agri Stats, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hy-Vee Inc., The Kroger Co. and Albertsons Companies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner:
TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
