Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Taylor v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Melanie Taylor
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Ianucci v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 2:2023cv06174
Plaintiff:
David Ianucci
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA doing business as Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 4:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Dehaven Jamel Williams
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Eberharter v. KeyBank et al
as 2:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Eberharter
Defendant:
Holly Erin White, Julia Lacey, Key Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Sneva v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Trevor Sneva
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Torres v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 5:2022cv05452
Plaintiff:
Leo Torres
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROGOFF v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
as 3:2021cv15777
Plaintiff:
MERIDETH ROGOFF
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA doing business as CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2019cv00879
Plaintiff:
Darryl Darvi Ellis and James Ellis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Bishop v. Chase Bank NA
as 3:2019cv08033
Defendant:
Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Ernest Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McClain v. Wells Fargo Company, & Wells Fargo & Company, NA et al
as 8:2017cv01094
Plaintiff:
Iris McClain
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Company, & Wells Fargo & Company, NA , Tim Sloan , J. P MOrgan Chase & Co & JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
