Cases 11 - 20 of 1,080
Ellis v. Wright Patterson AFB
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ellis
Defendant:
Wright Patterson AFB
Joe Teague, Jr. v. Arthur Gepner
as 24-1393
Plaintiff:
JOE EDWARDS TEAGUE, JR.
Defendant:
ARTHUR L. GEPNER, for Cherokee Federal d/b/a CN3S, BOBBY DETTMER, Flux Resources LLC, CLINT BUCKLEY, Flux Resources LLC and others
Ellis v. Clough et al
as 1:2024cv02805
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Abigail Clough, Patrick F. Cassidy, Christopher McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Dudley v. Burgos et al
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Tamara Burgos and Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dudley v. Montaque
as 5:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Myra Montaque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. City of Corvallis
as 6:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Charlyn Ellis
Defendant:
City of Corvallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Puglia v. Alvin Nienhuis, et al
as 24-10186
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PUGLIA
Defendant:
ALVIN NIENHUIS, KENNETH D. HAYDEN, PHILIP LAKIN and others
Ellis v. City of White Settlement
as 4:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Eric L. Ellis
Respondent:
City of White Settlement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
