Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GANNET NEWS
as 3:2020cv00276
Defendant:
GANNET NEWS
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. T-MOBILE
as 3:2019cv00063
Defendant:
T-MOBILE
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HARPER v. VASS et al
as 2:2018cv08518
Plaintiff:
GARY HARPER
Defendant:
TONY VASS, PSE&G CO., NOEL CHRISTMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mackie et al
as 2:2017cv00765
Defendant:
Richard Ambro, Michael Henry, James Lydon and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
as 4:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Defendant:
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 4:2016cv01074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Smith v. New York State Department of Education et al
as 1:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith
Defendant:
New York State Department of Education and New York State Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Alexander v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 15-60875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, KEVIN RAYBORN, Board of Supervisors and (Chanceries) of Lawrence County, DAVID EARL JOHNSON, Board of Supervisors and (Chanceries) of Pearl River County and others
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01804
Plaintiff:
WAYNE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THOMAS LICIARDELLO, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
