Cases 11 - 20 of 32
ASMAR et al v. City of Walled Lake et al
as 2:2016cv14101
Plaintiff:
FRANK ASMAR and TINELLE PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
City of Walled Lake and DENNIS WHIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Defendant:
Michael Whitfield , Clarksdale Police Department , City of Clarksdale, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaefer v. Whitted et al
as 1:2015cv00163
Defendant:
City of Austin and Jonathan Whitted
Plaintiff:
John Stephens Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashcraft et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv02308
Plaintiff:
Juliann Ashcraft , Claire Caldwell , Krista Carter and others
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Arizona State Forestry Division , Yavapai, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whitted v. City of Hayward et al
as 3:2014cv02526
Plaintiff:
Amy Louise Whitted
Defendant:
City of Hayward, Hayward Police Department, Diane Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00456
Defendant:
C Bianco, County of Riverside, -, C Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Bodnar v. County of Riverside et al
as 1:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
County of Riverside, C. Bianco, C. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITTED v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2013cv07316
Plaintiff:
JALAL WHITTED
Defendant:
CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE, ANGEL VALENTIN, JOHN PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. City of Clarksdale et al
as 4:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Elbert Hines, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Clarksdale , William Whit Read , Jason Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
