Cases 21 - 30 of 36
M.H. et al v. Town of Belmont et al
as 1:2017cv11344
Plaintiff:
M. H. and N. C.
Defendant:
Town of Belmont , John P. Phelan , Daniel Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C. v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2017cv04016
Plaintiff:
N. C.
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , Toney Chaplin , Gabriel Alcaraz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMBS et al v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2016cv02402
Plaintiff:
GEORGE COMBS , J. C. and N. C.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , HARRY BURKE , THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Mills, et al
as 4:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Steve Allen Dillon
Defendant:
J. L. Mills, N. C. Judicial System, Pitt County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyrone Hurt v. N. C. Transit
as 15-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
N. C. TRANSIT
Turner v. N. C. State Dept. of Human and Health, et al
as 5:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Wendell M. Turner
Defendant:
N. C. State Dept. of Human and Health and State of North Carolina Gov.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cummin et al v. North et al
as 2:2015cv01043
Plaintiff:
David L. Cummin, M.D. , Crystal Cummin , J. C. and others
Defendant:
Lanny North, David Valkinburg, Edwin Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Smith v. N. Murphy
as 14-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE RANDALL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
N. C. MURPHY, CHARLES GRANT, T. J. MURPHY and others
Steve Smith v. N. Murphy
as 14-1918
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE RANDALL SMITH
Defendant - Appellant:
N. C. MURPHY, CHARLES GRANT, T. J. MURPHY and others
Defendant:
JAMIE MITCHELL and RICHARD SMITH
Rankin v. Statesville, NC, Police Dept., et al
as 5:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Delbert Lamar Rankin
Defendant:
Frank G. Johns , Carolyn B. Bouchard , Tom Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
