Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Yongo v. Department of the Army Et al. et al
as 5:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Paul Collins Yongo
Defendant:
Department of the Army Et al., Robert Gates, Department of the Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dewsnup v. Obama et al
as 2:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Greg Dewsnup
Defendant:
Barak Obama, Robert Gates and Julius Genachowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FRAME v. GATES
as 4:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
DAVID W FRAME
Defendant:
ROBERT GATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Gates et al
as 5:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Connie Rhodes
Defendant:
Robert Gates and Barack Hussein Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Potter et al
as 1:2009cv21721
Plaintiff:
Michael David Johnson
Defendant:
John (Jack) E Potter, Robert Gates and William Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Tansil #383204 v. Department of the Navy et al
as 2:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
Luther Brady Tansil #383204
Defendant:
Department of the Navy, Secretary of the Navy, Board of Correction of Naval Records and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bryan Hole, et al v. Texas A & M University, et al
as 09-40311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN G. HOLE and ERIC E. GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY, ROBERT GATES, DAVID PARROT and others
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01624
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE H. BUSH, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, DICK CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lynum v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00465
Plaintiff:
Felicia Lynum
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert Gates and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00983
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE H. BUSH, JENNA BUSH HAGER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
