Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Havens v. CDOC, et al
as 16-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL HAVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF COLORADO, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Roman v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv05680
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roman
Defendant:
City of New York , P.O. Timothy Canniff, Sgt. David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gale v. Smukler et al
as 1:2016cv01654
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gale
Defendant:
Robert Smukler , Brian Dingwall , David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. McKelvey et al
as 4:2016cv00404
Plaintiff:
Herbert McDaniels
Defendant:
Rick McKelvey, Daniel Watson, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Melton Truck Lines, Inc., Robert A Peterson, Michael Dargel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv03409
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Chicago Police Officers, David Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Johnson, et al
as 15-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, Secretary US Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration and DAVID JOHNSON, Supervisory Air Marshal, in his individual and official capacities
Roman v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05730
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roman
Defendant:
City of New York, Timothy Canniff, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Witmer et al
as 1:2015cv01349
Plaintiff:
Antonio Watson
Defendant:
Todd Witmer , Lower Paxton Township , David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Luke v. Eby et al
as 1:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Luke
Defendant:
Andy Eby, Jennifer Shockley, Krys Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
