Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Fareed v. Blackmon
as 3:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jamal Fareed
Defendant:
MA, LMFT Brandon Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv00767
Plaintiff:
Eric Blackmon
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Gregory Jones, Eugene Schleder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2018cv06419
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, MARK GONSALES, Walnut Creek Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCasland v. Upshur County, Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00401
Defendant:
Alan Wade, Kacey Deluca, Lakisha Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Everette McCasland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Mckimmie et al
as 1:2018cv00650
Plaintiff:
Rasaun Blackmon
Defendant:
Christopher Mckimmie and Samuel Cale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. BOREN, et al.
as 4:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
THERESA B BRADLEY
Defendant:
RICKY BOREN , FREDDIE BLACKMON , CHARLES KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
THOMPSON et al v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
MARK A THOMPSON and KEVIN D SAMPLES
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DUNCAN SCOTT, DARLENE E DICKEYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gents v. Blackmon et al
as 2:2017cv12476
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Gentz
Defendant:
Sharon D. Blackmon , Thomas Quasarano , Detroit, City of and others
Emesowum v. Blackmon et al
as 4:2017cv02249
Plaintiff:
Benedict Emesowum
Defendant:
Robert Blackmon , Alan Rosen and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Madison County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
Latoya Brown , Lawrence Blackmon , Herbert Anthony Green and others
Defendant:
Madison County, Mississippi , Randall S. Tucker , Madison County Sheriff's Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
