Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Celli v. Perez et al
as 7:2022cv02353
Plaintiff:
Lucio Celli
Defendant:
Daniel Perez, Benjamin Silverman, Randi Weingarten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Celli v. Katzman et al
as 7:2022cv02354
Plaintiff:
Lucio Celli
Defendant:
Judge Katzman, Magistrate Scanlon, Judge Brodie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
CELLI v. WEINGARTEN et al
as 1:2021cv03359
Plaintiff:
LUCIO CELLI
Defendant:
RANDI WEINGARTEN, COGAN, BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Raghubir v. Cogan et al
as 1:2021cv06705
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
Judge Brian Cogan and USDC EDNY Office of the Clerk of Court, All Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MediGrow LLC v. Natalie M LaPrade Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Defendant:
M.D. Elizabeth Q Hines, M.D. C Obi Onyewu, Saundra O Washington and others
Plaintiff:
MediGrow LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
White v. Simpson et al
as 2:2019cv02111
Defendant:
Jeff Ross, Tom Cogan, Mary Townsend and others
Plaintiff:
Chris White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CENIZO GROUP LLC v. COGAN
as 5:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
CENIZO GROUP LLC
Defendant:
CRAIG COGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Engel et al v. Gelernt et al
as 3:2017cv05127
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel and El Chapo Guzman
Defendant:
Michelle Gelernt, Michael Schneider and Judge Cogan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Engel et al v. Gelernt et al
as 3:2017cv05126
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel and El Chapo Guzman
Defendant:
Michelle Gelernt, Michael Schneider and Judge Cogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ma'at El v. Doe
as 16-3767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Asirus Ma'at El, AKA C. Martin El
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer Norris Cardoza, City of New York, Officer Abul Chowdhury, Shield # 03375 and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Other and Other Accomplice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
