Cases 1 - 10 of 56,752
Robinson v. Terry et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padgett et al v. The County of Meade, Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Theresa Padgett and David Padgett
Defendant:
The County of Meade, Kentucky and John Doe Nos. I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILKINSON et al v. City of Dayton Ohio et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WILKINSON, Keeley Nelson, Darlene Guynn and others
Defendant:
City of Dayton Ohio, Kamron Afzal, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Discola v. Deml
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
John Discola
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malon v. Koskinas et al
as 3:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
Eric Malon
Defendant:
Foti Koskinas, Ryan Paulsson, Erin Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adumat v. Deganhart et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
John P. Adumat
Defendant:
Mary E. Deganhart and Brenda R. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McGrath v. Edmonds et al
as 8:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
John McGrath
Defendant:
Richard Edmonds and City of Clearwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
John v. Deml et al
as 2:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Discola John
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml and Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Discola v. Deml
as 2:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
John Discola
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dopkins v. Fridley Police Department et al
as 0:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Bradford Cain Dopkins
Defendant:
Fridley Police Department, Bridget McBride, Enis Vatres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
