Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Martin v. Crossville Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Gary Joseph Martin
Defendant:
Crossville Police Department and Tennessee State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herndon et al v. Ellis et al
as 2:2021cv03192
Plaintiff:
Chris Herndon, Damon Bevins, Dustin Kreinbrook and others
Defendant:
Justin Ellis, Colleen Walz, Debra Lehman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee et al v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2020cv08081
Defendant:
Coral Evans, Doug Ducey and Flagstaff, City of
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin McGhee and Gennaro Stephen Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Lake et al
as 2:2019at00676
Defendant:
City of Vallejo Police Department, City of Vallejo, Joseph Martin Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lake v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2019at00677
Defendant:
City of Vallejo Police Department and City of Vallejo
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGhee v. Fridlund-Horne
as 3:2019cv08154
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin McGhee
Defendant:
Elaine Fridlund-Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Edwards, et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Stewart Murphy, Oscar Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Grady et al
as 1:2017cv06775
Plaintiff:
Rahul-Ebenezer Daniels
Defendant:
Joseph Martin Grady , Kathryn Diamond Karayannis , Frederick John Steffen, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGhee v. Fridlund-Horne et al
as 3:2017cv08152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin McGhee
Defendant:
Elaine Fridlund-Horne, Coconino, County of, Coconino County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Hancq et al
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lenir Richardson
Defendant:
John Hancq, Carolyn Ney, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
