Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. HONORABLE DAVID ACKER et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Respondent:
HONORABLE DAVID ACKER and ALEXANDER ROY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DETSCHELT v. NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DETSCHELT
Defendant:
NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT and JEFFREY M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH et al
as 2:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
LAWERANCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH, HEATHER STARR and LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OWEN v. TAYLOR
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
KENDRA OWEN
Defendant:
M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez v. Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Alvarez
Defendant:
M Taylor and Unknown DiePietro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberto Durand v. Lorin Taylor, et al
as 22-16047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIN M. TAYLOR and LYNN BIGLEY
Roberto Durand v. Lorin Taylor, et al
as 22-15980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIN M. TAYLOR and LYNN BIGLEY
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Sharon Gleason, et al
as 22-35446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Plaintiff:
ALASKA NATIVE CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON L. GLEASON, JONAS M. WALKER, BRYAN SCHRODER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
