Cases 1 - 8 of 8
John Singletary, Jr. v. The City of North Charleston
as 17-1569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY and others
Defendant:
OFFICER JONATHAN GLENN, CHANNEL 5 NEWS, CEDRUS DAVIS & FLOYD and others
Landry v. Chabert Operational Management Company, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv03900
Plaintiff:
Saul Francis Landry, III
Defendant:
Chabert Operational Management Company, L.L.C., Joseph Waitz, Jr., Houma Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Singletary v. North Charleston, The City of et al
as 2:2015cv04463
Plaintiff:
John G Singletary, Jr
Defendant:
North Charleston, The City of, North Charleston Police Department, Keith Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Abbott et al
as 6:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Jones
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Wood County, Texas, Wood County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. KHNL/KGMB LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Davis
Defendant:
KHNL/KGMB LLC, Raycom Media, Inc., Oahu Publications Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Paselk v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-41049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL PASELK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and also all unidentified associates, directors, staff, empoloyees, officers, and volunteers in their official and individual capacities and others
Paselk v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
State of Texas, Hopkins County Texas, Hopkins County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dale et al v. Raycom National, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01133
Plaintiff:
Billy Dale, Billy Dale, Maurice Marbury and others
Defendant:
Raycom National, Inc., Raycom National, Inc., WOIO of Ohio LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
