Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Timmons v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lasheena Crawford, Bradley Keith Hunt, Lt Mike Hartson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
John McSheffrey v. Lily Wilder
as 22-2131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MCSHEFFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities and RYAN T. DAVIS, in his individual and Official capacities
John McSheffrey v. Lily Wilder
as 22-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN P. MCSHEFFREY and JOHN MCSHEFFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities and RYAN T. DAVIS, in his individual and Official capacities
McSheffrey v. Wilder et al
as 2:2021cv00630
Plaintiff:
John P. McSheffrey
Defendant:
Lily I. Wilder and Ryan T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
Marvin T Davis
Defendant:
Officer Rachael Ward, Officer Ryan Morgan and City of Middletown Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHEPHERD v. HTD CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE, HENRY T. DAVIS, HTD CONSULTING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2018cv03250
Defendant:
Officer Renfro, City of Springfield and Officer T. Davis
Plaintiff:
Willie Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY, IN et al
as 1:2018cv02436
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, IN, MCCORDSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFFS' DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
GENE T. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv02159
Plaintiff:
GENE T. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
