Cases 151 - 160 of 508
BURTON v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv01640
Plaintiff:
JOYCE BURTON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and CHARLES LINEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437
Calvin Thompson v. Union Cty Social Ser, et al
as 10-2031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION CTY SOCIAL SER, CHARLES J. GILLON, SUSAN EAGLE and others
Fred v. Washoe Tribe
as 2:2010cv00845
Plaintiff:
Ronda Whiterock Fred
Defendant:
Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Michael Duane Harris v. John A. Wagner et al
as 2:2010cv02378
Defendant:
Director Phillip L. Browning and Director John A. Wagner
Grow), GA43(G.R) (Los Angeles County Dept. Of Public And Social Service: Civic Center Dist:
Mrs Phan
Charles Bobo v. Arizona Department of Economic
as 10-35315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES L. BOBO
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY
MICHELFELDER v. MICHELFELDER
as 2:2010cv01409
Plaintiff:
CLARE G. MICHELFELDER
Defendant:
ERWIN D. MICHELFELDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan v. Chippewa Indian Tribal Court et al
as 2:2010cv11324
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Chippewa Indian Tribal Court and Anishnabek Community Family Services
A.M.T. et al v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2010cv00358
Defendant:
PATRICIA CASANOVA and ANNE WALTERMAN MURPHY
Plaintiff:
J. M. G., J. J. M. and A. M. T.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finch et al v. Jane Doe 2 et al
as 1:2010cv10497
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ann Finch, Roxanne S. Prince, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority and Jon Kingsdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dowdell et al v. Imhof
as 2:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
Margaret Dowdell and Michelle Shriki
Defendant:
John E. Imhof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
