Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 343
Douglas, et al v. Hirshon, et al
as 22-1483
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVEN FOWLER, JOEL DOUGLAS and JAMES LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID HIRSHON and LOSU LLC
Defendant: BIRCH POINT STORAGE LLC, MICHAEL LYDEN, SHAWN LYDEN and others
Interested Party: WHIPPING POST LLC and MARC FISHMAN
Type: Other Statutes RICO
TOLER v. GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS d/b/a GREEN ARROW LOANS, et al.
as 1:2022cv01214
Plaintiff: John Toler
Defendant: Green Arrow Solutions d/b/a Green Arrow Loans, Integra Financial Services, LLC, Nevada Impact Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Biers v. Dentons US et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff: Samuel L. Biers
Defendant: Dentons US a Utah Entity doing business as Dentons, Durham, Jones, Pinegar, Zions Bancorporation, Salal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 22-1383
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Plaintiff: ANGELA BUCHER, WILLIAM BYRWA, BILL DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, FCA US, LLC, ALPHONS IACOBELLI and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Rauch, D.C. et al
as 2:2022cv02424
Plaintiff: Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Jeffrey S. Rauch, D.C. doing business as Rego Park Healthcare Alliance, Jacqueline M. Lewis, M.D., Richard C. Koffler, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55407
Plaintiff / Appellant: SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Garza et al v. Herrman & Herrman, PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff: Arturo Garza, LaQuinta Jones and Doris Morales
Defendant: Herrman & Herrman, PLLC, Gregory Herrman, Steven C. Stratso and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55373
Plaintiff / Appellant: SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55375
Plaintiff / Appellant: SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Inpatient Consultants Of North Carolina, P.C. v. Goad et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00199
Plaintiff: Inpatient Consultants Of North Carolina, P.C.
Defendant: Dr. Bradley J. Goad, Dr. Jeffrey Garland, Carrie Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?