Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Lundbeck LLC
as 24-1043
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES 44, LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company and others
Defendant:
LUNDBECK LLC, a Delaware corporation, CARING VOICE COALITION, INC., an Idaho non-profit corporation, THERACOM, LLC, an Ohio corporation and others
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07604
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company, MSPA Claims 1, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant:
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., Caring Voice Coalition, Inc., an Idaho non-profit corporation, Adira Foundation, a Virginia non-profit corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Caring Voice Coalition, Inc.
as 22-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company, MSPA CLAIMS 1 LLC, a Florida limited liability company, SERIES PMPI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARING VOICE COALITION, INC. and UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al. v. Lundbeck LLC, et al.
as 3:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC, MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lundbeck LLC, Caring Voice Coalition, Inc., Adira Foundation f/k/a Facilitating Patient Health and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, SERIES PMPI and others
Not Classified By Court:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS PROV, SERIES LLC
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., ADVANCED CARE SCRIPTS and PATIENT ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Ranbaxy Inc et al
as 1:2020cv11023
Plaintiff:
MSPA Claims 1 LLC, MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and SERIES PMPI
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Ranbaxy Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00982
Plaintiff:
MSPA Claims 1, LLC, MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and SERIES PMPI
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES, LLC v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 3:2019cv21607
Defendant:
ASCENSIA DIABETES CARE US INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, LIFESCAN, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC and MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES, LLC et al v. SANOFI AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2018cv02211
Plaintiff:
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES, LLC , MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC and MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC
Defendant:
SANOFI AVENTIS U.S. LLC, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
