Cases 121 - 130 of 689
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Aidas Joseph Mattis et al
as 2:2023cv02056
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Aidas Joseph Mattis individually and d/b/a The Fox & Hounds, Edita Lipas Mattis individually and d/b/a The Fox & Hounds, Tony Edward Romano individually and d/b/a The Fox & Hounds and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Adilio et al
as 8:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Santos Adilio, Edwin Moreno Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of Carbonero, Inc. d/b/a El Carbonero Restaurant and Carbonero, Inc. doing business as El Carbonero Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Zuffa, LLC v. Khan et al
as 3:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC doing business as Ultimate Fighting Championship
Defendant:
Hamza Khan Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders, principals, managers and/or members of The Grove 65 LLC d/b/a The Grove, Nouman Khan Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders, principals, managers and/or members of The Grove 65 LLC d/b/a The Grove and The Grove 65 LLC doing business as The Grove
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Theft of Cable Services
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Parker Foods, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Celebrity Lounge, LLC, Lakino White, Parker Foods, LLC doing business as B Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. MS Management L.L.C. et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
MS Management L.L.C. doing business as Pier 34 Seafood & Pub, Larry D. Barksdale, Christopher Mingle and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. et al v. The Nett Group LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
The Nett Group LLC doing business as Axis & Alibi Bar doing business as Axis Bar doing business as Axis & Alibi and Carlos Palomo doing business as Axis & Alibi Bar doing business as Axis Bar doing business as Axis & Alibi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. 77 Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2023cv20653
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
77 Enterprises LLC d/b/a 77 Sport Bar, FERNANDO YANES, Yennyfer Zerpa and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Cimar Scaff et al
as 8:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Cimar Scaff individually and d/b/a Silva's Brazilian Bar & Grill, Rick Silva individually and d/b/a Silva's Brazilian Bar & Grill, Objective Enterprises an unknown business entity d/b/a Silva's Brazilian Bar & Grill and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Breakwater Holdings LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Breakwater Holdings LLC, Twenty 8 South LLC d/b/a Dapper Duck Bar, Hadi Fakhoury and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. K B G, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
K B G, INC. doing business as Derby Bar & Grill and William Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
