Cases 91 - 100 of 2,975
Raymond Richardson v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7147
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND ANDREW RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
Daddario v. Fuller et al
as 1:2023cv04950
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Daddario
Defendant:
C Andrew Fuller, Kathlene Gosselin, Roberta McCormac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayer v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00785
Petitioner:
Karl Andrew Mayer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gebar Byrd v. Michele Buckner, et al
as 23-3640
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gebar Byrd
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, In her official capacity as acting warden of Potosi Correctional Center and Andrew Bailey, Attorney General of Missouri
Andrew Cairns v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 23-2900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW CAIRNS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Huckfeldt v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00426
Petitioner:
Brian Huckfeldt and Brian Andrew Huckfeldt
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paige v. Holloway
as 3:2023cv01102
Petitioner:
James Andrew Paige
Respondent:
James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis vs Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cartwright v. State Of Texas
as 9:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
Ira Andrew Cartwright
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julius Reason, III v. Warden Janson
as 23-7129
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIUS ANDREW REASON, III
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JANSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
