Cases 91 - 100 of 1,086
Orlando Sanchez v. Neil McDowell
as 23-55073
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORLANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Moreno-Sanchez v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Santos Moreno-Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Swan v. Warden, Sanchez Unit
as 1:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Dylan Jeffrey Swan
Respondent:
Warden, Sanchez Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez-Lara v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
Eduardo Sanchez-Lara
Respondent:
Warden Warden Garza and Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Bird
as 4:2022cv09106
Petitioner:
Jacinto Sanchez
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valle-Sanchez v. Withers
as 3:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Luis Del Valle-Sanchez
Defendant:
Shanon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. F.J.
as 4:2022cv01077
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Garrido F.J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00553
Petitioner:
Jose Manriquez Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Cooley
as 5:2022cv05793
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sanchez Smith
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruelas v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00491
Petitioner:
Thaddaeus Sanchez Ruelas
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
