Cases 111 - 120 of 465
HOLLOWAY v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2017cv11750
Petitioner:
STEVEN D HOLLOWAY
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, RICHARD WELLS, PATRICIA TAULANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wells v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00944
Petitioner:
John Wells
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leroy Wells v. Collette Peters, et al
as 17-35820
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Respondent - Appellee:
COLLETTE PETERS, JERI TAYLOR and MIKE GOWER
Wells v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2017cv01602
Respondent:
Bridgitte Amsberry, Brian Belleque, Michael F. Gower and others
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leroy Wells v. Bridgette Amsberry, et al
as 17-35815
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIDGETTE AMSBERRY, COLLETTE PETERS, BRIAN BELLEQUE and others
Wells-Bey v. Kizziah
as 7:2017cv00156
Petitioner:
Rodorrio Wells-Bey
Respondent:
Gregory Kizziah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WELLS v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00460
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Petitioner:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2017cv01371
Respondent:
Bridgette Amsberry, Brian Belleque, Michael Gowers and others
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eugene A. Sinohue v. J.A. Lizarraga
as 2:2017cv06182
Petitioner:
Eugene A. Sinohue and Eugene A Sinohue
Respondent:
J.A. Lizarraga
Interested Party:
Frank Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Lawson
as 6:2017cv03226
Petitioner:
William Allen Wells
Respondent:
Teri Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
