Cases 11 - 20 of 1,007
MORRIS v. RENAWL, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02141
Petitioner:
GREGORY L. MORRIS, JR.
Respondent:
RENAWL, INC. and C. NEWSOM FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warren v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2023cv03391
Petitioner:
Morris J. Warren
Respondent:
United States District Court and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Risby v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv02799
Petitioner:
William Morris Risby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Herman Morris, Jr. v. William Rumer
as 23-13997
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM C. RUMER
Morris v. Cain
as 23-60591
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Morris, also known as Christopher Jermaine Morris
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner of Mississippi Department of Corrections
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 5:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner:
Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morris v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Adarion Morris
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. Turner
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Lee Turner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCKELVIE v. HOUSER
as 2:2023cv03733
Petitioner:
DARRELL MCKELVIE
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
