General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,964
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner: Adam Hale
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00237
Petitioner: Preston Moore
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, Jr. v. Ogle et al
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner: Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Respondent: Adam Ogle and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner: Alexander Adames
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv11273
Petitioner: Christopher Sanchez, Sr.
Respondent: Adam Douglas
Adam Flores v. USA
as 24-1838
Petitioner: ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00743
Petitioner: Adam Abel Chavez
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kauffman #360639 v. Thornell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv08083
Petitioner: Zion Z Kauffman and Luke Zion Yochai-Adams-Trimmer
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner: John Yung
Respondent: N.Y.C Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?