General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,899
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner: WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christopherson v. Clarke
as 3:2024cv00351
Petitioner: Mark Todd Christopherson
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earp v. Clarke
as 2:2024cv00190
Petitioner: Chaz Earp
Respondent: Harold Clarke and Director of the Va D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner: Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Cooper v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6294
Petitioner: KENNETH DWIGHT COOPER
Respondent: HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Clark v. Swanson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv10681
Petitioner: Calvin Clark
Respondent: Swanson and David S. Leyton
Deandre Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6272
Petitioner: DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner: Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6280
Petitioner: RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of D.O.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?